<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Rl on Omanshu Thapliyal</title><link>https://omanshuthapliyal.github.io/tags/rl/</link><description>Recent content in Rl on Omanshu Thapliyal</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2025 11:07:46 -0700</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://omanshuthapliyal.github.io/tags/rl/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Reward is enough — when can we 'reinforce' the learning?</title><link>https://omanshuthapliyal.github.io/blog/reward-is-enough/</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2025 11:07:46 -0700</pubDate><guid>https://omanshuthapliyal.github.io/blog/reward-is-enough/</guid><description>&lt;p>&lt;em>This blog post summarizes the papers &lt;strong>Settling the Reward Hypothesis&lt;/strong>&lt;sup id="fnref:1">&lt;a href="#fn:1" class="footnote-ref" role="doc-noteref">1&lt;/a>&lt;/sup> and &lt;strong>Utility Theory for Sequential Decision Making&lt;/strong> &lt;sup id="fnref:2">&lt;a href="#fn:2" class="footnote-ref" role="doc-noteref">2&lt;/a>&lt;/sup>.&lt;/em>&lt;/p>
&lt;p>The &lt;strong>reward hypothesis&lt;/strong> is at the core of Reinforcement Learning (RL) in that whether sequential action problems can be posed as some sort of a reward maximization. One of the founders of modern RL, Richard S. Sutton, puts it as&lt;sup id="fnref:3">&lt;a href="#fn:3" class="footnote-ref" role="doc-noteref">3&lt;/a>&lt;/sup>:&lt;/p>
&lt;blockquote>
&lt;p>&amp;ldquo;That all of what we mean by goals and purposes can be well thought of as maximization of the expected value of the cumulative sum of a received scalar signal (reward).&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>