<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Mechanistic-Interpretability on Omanshu Thapliyal</title><link>https://omanshuthapliyal.github.io/tags/mechanistic-interpretability/</link><description>Recent content in Mechanistic-Interpretability on Omanshu Thapliyal</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><atom:link href="https://omanshuthapliyal.github.io/tags/mechanistic-interpretability/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Mechanistic Interpretability of State Space Models</title><link>https://omanshuthapliyal.github.io/projects/mechanistic-interpretability-of-state-space-models/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://omanshuthapliyal.github.io/projects/mechanistic-interpretability-of-state-space-models/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="problem">Problem&lt;/h2>
&lt;p>Hybrid language models such as NVIDIA&amp;rsquo;s Nemotron-H and TII&amp;rsquo;s Falcon-H1 now
combine attention with state space model (SSM) layers at tens of billions of
parameters. Interpretability tools can already find the layer where an SSM
computes a behaviour, but not which part of its recurrent state carries it.
Two properties stand in the way. An intervention at a single step is undone
as later inputs rebuild the state, and any change of coordinates gives an
equally valid state, so a single state coordinate has no fixed meaning.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>